<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rebuild of Evangelion 1.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/</link>
	<description>Design of a minimalist, content of a maximalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 12:22:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdptsvnj</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-68727</link>
		<dc:creator>bdptsvnj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-68727</guid>
		<description>aM2NzH  &lt;a href=&quot;http://qaxvfycrqeqt.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;qaxvfycrqeqt&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aM2NzH  <a href="http://qaxvfycrqeqt.com/" rel="nofollow">qaxvfycrqeqt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornelia</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-68721</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-68721</guid>
		<description>Just the type of iinhsgt we need to fire up the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just the type of iinhsgt we need to fire up the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sol thomp</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-66230</link>
		<dc:creator>sol thomp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 02:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-66230</guid>
		<description>This was a pretty awesome series it reminded me of Gundam Wing. I miss old shows like this on toonami and adult swim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a pretty awesome series it reminded me of Gundam Wing. I miss old shows like this on toonami and adult swim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teddy</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-66126</link>
		<dc:creator>Teddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 07:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-66126</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliments! My review is more on the aesthetic and visual aspect of the remake, and less on the technicalities. I&#039;m not an Eva expert too so I guess it shouldn&#039;t weigh on the storyline changes, but I&#039;m excited to see how the next few films play out differently from the animated series :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliments! My review is more on the aesthetic and visual aspect of the remake, and less on the technicalities. I&#8217;m not an Eva expert too so I guess it shouldn&#8217;t weigh on the storyline changes, but I&#8217;m excited to see how the next few films play out differently from the animated series :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toptomcat</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-66105</link>
		<dc:creator>Toptomcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 21:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-66105</guid>
		<description>Great side-by-side comparison- but this could have done with some discussion of vitally important scenes in the original that *weren&#039;t* in Rebuild, perhaps most interestingly the failure of EVA-01 to reach out by itself and deflect the falling beams from hitting Shinji.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great side-by-side comparison- but this could have done with some discussion of vitally important scenes in the original that *weren&#8217;t* in Rebuild, perhaps most interestingly the failure of EVA-01 to reach out by itself and deflect the falling beams from hitting Shinji.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NihonQC &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evangelion: 1.0 You Are [Not] Alone</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-65597</link>
		<dc:creator>NihonQC &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evangelion: 1.0 You Are [Not] Alone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-65597</guid>
		<description>[...] par vous mÃªme si vous allez voir quelques uns des centaines de montages comparatifs rÃ©alisÃ©s par un blogueur, sur teddy-o-ted.com (prenez note qu&#8217;il y en a sur 6 pages&#8230;). Donc mÃªme si la grande majoritÃ© des scÃ¨nes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] par vous mÃªme si vous allez voir quelques uns des centaines de montages comparatifs rÃ©alisÃ©s par un blogueur, sur teddy-o-ted.com (prenez note qu&#8217;il y en a sur 6 pages&#8230;). Donc mÃªme si la grande majoritÃ© des scÃ¨nes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teddy</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-65463</link>
		<dc:creator>Teddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-65463</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliments, Chris! Actually I&#039;m not done with the comparison yet (I&#039;m stuck around episode 3 or something), I couldn&#039;t find the time to crop the screenshots and composite them into images and then upload them.

Many people got this impression that Gainax is just treating the Evangelion series as an awesome cash cow, since the Rebuild, with largely similar storyline for the first installment of the 4-film series (as compared to the original anime), had earned them considerable amount of money.

Cosmetic changes aside, there are indeed several aspects of the new storyline that might signify a change in how things turn out for the next few films - like how they&#039;ve axed a few angels out of the series, the puzzling change of Lilith&#039;s face, the change in the SEELE and NERV logos and etc. Indeed, it&#039;s suspicious when the animators took great pain to faithfully recreate many of the insignificant minute details (like the passengers on the train, the clutter on Misato&#039;s apartment).

I can&#039;t help but speculate too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliments, Chris! Actually I&#8217;m not done with the comparison yet (I&#8217;m stuck around episode 3 or something), I couldn&#8217;t find the time to crop the screenshots and composite them into images and then upload them.</p>
<p>Many people got this impression that Gainax is just treating the Evangelion series as an awesome cash cow, since the Rebuild, with largely similar storyline for the first installment of the 4-film series (as compared to the original anime), had earned them considerable amount of money.</p>
<p>Cosmetic changes aside, there are indeed several aspects of the new storyline that might signify a change in how things turn out for the next few films &#8211; like how they&#8217;ve axed a few angels out of the series, the puzzling change of Lilith&#8217;s face, the change in the SEELE and NERV logos and etc. Indeed, it&#8217;s suspicious when the animators took great pain to faithfully recreate many of the insignificant minute details (like the passengers on the train, the clutter on Misato&#8217;s apartment).</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but speculate too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-65461</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-65461</guid>
		<description>Hey there!  These comparison shots are fantastic.  I&#039;ve heard a lot about the making of this, and it&#039;s actually not just a remake, though they&#039;re trying hard not to make that sound like a sequel either, hence &#039;Rebuild&#039;. 

The changes that are beyond cosmetic are likely very intentional, given the chalk-outline opening scene.  Making the water red in pretty much all scenes, for example, and moving Lilith&#039;s mask from her to the Seele monoliths.  Also strange things I don&#039;t get, like the track number and time change of Shinji&#039;s music player. Only the seconds remain the same number.  When everything is so faithfully re-rendered, a change like this is suspicious. 

While I don&#039;t know because I haven&#039;t seen the rest, could this be the result of Shinji&#039;s wish...?  A chance to try again?  It&#039;s my speculations :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there!  These comparison shots are fantastic.  I&#8217;ve heard a lot about the making of this, and it&#8217;s actually not just a remake, though they&#8217;re trying hard not to make that sound like a sequel either, hence &#8216;Rebuild&#8217;. </p>
<p>The changes that are beyond cosmetic are likely very intentional, given the chalk-outline opening scene.  Making the water red in pretty much all scenes, for example, and moving Lilith&#8217;s mask from her to the Seele monoliths.  Also strange things I don&#8217;t get, like the track number and time change of Shinji&#8217;s music player. Only the seconds remain the same number.  When everything is so faithfully re-rendered, a change like this is suspicious. </p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t know because I haven&#8217;t seen the rest, could this be the result of Shinji&#8217;s wish&#8230;?  A chance to try again?  It&#8217;s my speculations :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teddY</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-64387</link>
		<dc:creator>teddY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-64387</guid>
		<description>@virtus: Thanks for informing me of the problem. I&#039;ve rectified it. Oh, and new screenshots and comparisons for Episodes 3 to 6 will be coming soon as well :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@virtus: Thanks for informing me of the problem. I&#8217;ve rectified it. Oh, and new screenshots and comparisons for Episodes 3 to 6 will be coming soon as well :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtus</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2008/04/23/rebuild-of-evangelion-10/#comment-64386</link>
		<dc:creator>virtus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=1878#comment-64386</guid>
		<description>Very nice comparison, thanks!  I noticed two places where the image addresses are incorrect (they link to the images right above them):

episode one -- Sachiel&#039;s leap
episode two -- Gendoâ€™s meeting with Seele members

The images are there, they&#039;re just not linked correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice comparison, thanks!  I noticed two places where the image addresses are incorrect (they link to the images right above them):</p>
<p>episode one &#8212; Sachiel&#8217;s leap<br />
episode two &#8212; Gendoâ€™s meeting with Seele members</p>
<p>The images are there, they&#8217;re just not linked correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

