<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building The Impossible &#8211; Tokyo Sky City</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/</link>
	<description>Design of a minimalist, content of a maximalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 12:22:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/#comment-68578</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=84#comment-68578</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been almost seven years since this post now, but now that the current Tokyo Sky Tree is nearing completion, the Burj Kahlifa is already complete, and even taller structures (like the Vertical City) are being proposed (TWO kilometers!!) do you think your opinions have changed concerning the feasability of the Sky City?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been almost seven years since this post now, but now that the current Tokyo Sky Tree is nearing completion, the Burj Kahlifa is already complete, and even taller structures (like the Vertical City) are being proposed (TWO kilometers!!) do you think your opinions have changed concerning the feasability of the Sky City?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/#comment-66544</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=84#comment-66544</guid>
		<description>I like the old Tokyo Tower, it is such a wonderful landmark.  The tower is the same even though its surroundings have changed so much
http://www.japansugoi.com/wordpress/tokyo-tower-then-and-now/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the old Tokyo Tower, it is such a wonderful landmark.  The tower is the same even though its surroundings have changed so much<br />
<a href="http://www.japansugoi.com/wordpress/tokyo-tower-then-and-now/" rel="nofollow">http://www.japansugoi.com/wordpress/tokyo-tower-then-and-now/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peyman</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/#comment-65937</link>
		<dc:creator>peyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=84#comment-65937</guid>
		<description>hello,can you please send me more information about sky city, thanks a lot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello,can you please send me more information about sky city, thanks a lot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/#comment-65448</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=84#comment-65448</guid>
		<description>Hello.pleas send for me more information and picpictures of sky city.thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.pleas send for me more information and picpictures of sky city.thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teddY</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/#comment-55044</link>
		<dc:creator>teddY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=84#comment-55044</guid>
		<description>This post was written four years back and I couldn&#039;t believe that you visited it :razz: teehee. Anyway, speaking of it, I think that an act of terrorism will not be able to bring down the whole tower, so does for a blaze (if there&#039;s good design). What really worries me now is that Japan sits on the intersection point of many moving (and subducting) tectonic plates, making the country more prone to earthquakes than any other countries. A huge structure like that will add unnecessary stress onto the fault lines, and like China&#039;s Three Gorges Dam, may cause new fault lines to appear due to the mass of the tower.

But one optimistic news is that scientists are not developing high strength carbon nanotubes that has a strength hundreds of times stronger than the strongest steel we can manufacture today and yet many times lighter. This makes it a good construction material, but for technical reasons, will not be feasible for mass manufacturing in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was written four years back and I couldn&#8217;t believe that you visited it :razz: teehee. Anyway, speaking of it, I think that an act of terrorism will not be able to bring down the whole tower, so does for a blaze (if there&#8217;s good design). What really worries me now is that Japan sits on the intersection point of many moving (and subducting) tectonic plates, making the country more prone to earthquakes than any other countries. A huge structure like that will add unnecessary stress onto the fault lines, and like China&#8217;s Three Gorges Dam, may cause new fault lines to appear due to the mass of the tower.</p>
<p>But one optimistic news is that scientists are not developing high strength carbon nanotubes that has a strength hundreds of times stronger than the strongest steel we can manufacture today and yet many times lighter. This makes it a good construction material, but for technical reasons, will not be feasible for mass manufacturing in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: habibid09</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/#comment-54889</link>
		<dc:creator>habibid09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=84#comment-54889</guid>
		<description>I agree, These arguments are a problem that needs to be carfully looked into, but they are easily fixed. the fire could not spread through the whole intire tower. That would almost be impposible unless there were explosions on each individual level. It would have to have some kind of system (not just sprinklers) to better put out a fire before it happens. The terroist thing is chance, im not saying that it can&#039;t happen but it is the same volunable than the twin towers. yeah it would be easier to hit because of the size but same difference. It would stop land construction from growing to forests that are left. it could even make space that was covered in concrete back to grenery. It seems very efficent and is a wonderful and futuristic way to reduce over population on land and help to stay green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, These arguments are a problem that needs to be carfully looked into, but they are easily fixed. the fire could not spread through the whole intire tower. That would almost be impposible unless there were explosions on each individual level. It would have to have some kind of system (not just sprinklers) to better put out a fire before it happens. The terroist thing is chance, im not saying that it can&#8217;t happen but it is the same volunable than the twin towers. yeah it would be easier to hit because of the size but same difference. It would stop land construction from growing to forests that are left. it could even make space that was covered in concrete back to grenery. It seems very efficent and is a wonderful and futuristic way to reduce over population on land and help to stay green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rahul rajput</title>
		<link>http://teddy-o-ted.com/blog/2004/11/07/building-the-impossible-tokyo-sky-city/#comment-49068</link>
		<dc:creator>rahul rajput</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teddy-o-ted.com/?p=84#comment-49068</guid>
		<description>I am not aggre with the comments mention above,because if TOKYO SKY CITY ones completed it will solve many problem such as  1. our precious land which is covered by this uncontroled construction, 2.we also save FUEL which is burnt by people in transportation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not aggre with the comments mention above,because if TOKYO SKY CITY ones completed it will solve many problem such as  1. our precious land which is covered by this uncontroled construction, 2.we also save FUEL which is burnt by people in transportation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

